SMS Reply Functionality

Criticism that branded sender IDs prevent message replies, with the suggestion that consumers should be able to reply 'STOP' to unwanted messages rather than navigating separate websites or phone numbers.

← Back to The Australian Government to Require SMS/MMS Sender ID Registraion

The current use of branded alpha codes is criticized for stripping away basic SMS functionality, as these sender IDs prevent users from replying directly to messages. While verifying sender identity is welcomed, commenters argue for a system overhaul that allows for both brand recognition and the ability to send a simple "STOP" command to opt out of marketing. By removing the need to navigate external websites or separate phone numbers, this change would empower consumers to manage unwanted spam more efficiently within their existing message threads.

2 comments tagged with this topic

View on HN · Topics
Alpha codes don't allow replies. As such if you need to reply it has to be from a number
View on HN · Topics
I welcome this move, enforcing that SMS messages come from who they say they'll come from is important. Personally I think the whole system of replacing the point of origin with a name needs to be overhauled. Allowing a name as well is fine, but the practice of delivering messages that can't be replied to is pretty poor. Rather than have to futz around with a different number or website to go to, I should be able to just reply "STOP" if (for example) Dominos keep spamming me with Pizza offers I don't want.