Summarizer

European Response Weakness

Criticism of EU's passive response to US actions, discussion of strongly-worded letters versus action, calls for European nuclear deterrent, and debate about European political unity and capability.

← Back to There were BGP anomalies during the Venezuela blackout

The comments reflect a deep frustration with Europe’s perceived passivity, with many dismissing "strongly worded letters" as cowardly and ineffective responses to a United States increasingly viewed as a geopolitical adversary. While some argue that diplomatic pushback is already occurring at the UN, critics call for more radical shifts toward self-reliance, ranging from aggressive economic retaliation—such as ignoring American intellectual property—to the launch of independent nuclear weapons programs. Ultimately, the debate highlights a cynical divide over whether the European Union possesses the political unity and "backbone" necessary to move beyond naive idealism and establish a credible, autonomous deterrent.

13 comments tagged with this topic

View on HN · Topics
It’s for sure another alarm signal for the EU to further reduce dependencies on our newest geopolitical enemy… the United States of America.
View on HN · Topics
the rest of the world is weirdly too passive, there's a smell of shock
View on HN · Topics
IMHO the rest of the world isn't asleep. Denmark's prime minister said the same as you, for example. US just got roasted at UN by inter alia, France, with ~20 countries either speaking the same or asking to speak on it. That's just from 30s with front page of nytimes.com.
View on HN · Topics
In EU, so far I believe only the PM of Spain had the backbone to speak properly with anything that could be considered "strongly worded", proving that it's possible. The others have been variants of "Celebrating liberation of the Venezuelan people from the illegitimate dictator, a new dawn for democracy! (oh and everyone (not naming names) please behave and try to be mindful of international law and human rights from now on)" Not a single word about the dead, for one. While the NYTimes headline names France as critical, here's Macron (still only posting) on Twitter: https://xcancel.com/EmmanuelMacron/status/200752538697719404... Meanwhile POTUS is over there talking literally and openly about how US are "going to run things" and motivating it with taking the oil and how they don't really care about democracy one way or other.
View on HN · Topics
It’s really dumb I’m sitting at -2 and the top reply is about a Macron tweet from 2 days ago, lying and saying no one else from Europe has said anything, and lying and saying anything besides the King of Spain was actually celebrating. You’re making stuff up. Full stop. You could easily have googled either thing I mentioned. You didn’t, choosing to free associate instead. May you reap what you sow.
View on HN · Topics
That just sounds like more 'strongly worded letters' which never go anywhere and they never do anything about. It's over for the EU. They rested on their laurels for too long and cowardice rotted them from the inside. I don't think Denmark will put even a smidge of resistance up. Trump is going to bark some orders, boots are going to hit the ground and it's fait accompli .
View on HN · Topics
What does action (i.e. not-strongly-worded-letters, i.e. not words) look like? Capture Trump? Invade the US? The idea the EU is some bureaucratic hellhole incapable of anything is really odd and nigh-universal - I'm used to righties adopting it from Brexit & antipathy for social demoracy, but I'm not used to see it as a despondent wailing from people otherwise sympathetic to it. Note no one even mentioned the EU - it's so universal a reaction to "US is acting bad" that it came out of nowhere. Not to pick on you: when I was first replying, I also replied as if it was the EU! Had to go back and read the comment I was replying to and corrected myself before posting.
View on HN · Topics
One non military but economical retaliation that would affect our industry is to stop respecting American’s intellectual property. Some variation of the trade bazooka. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Coercion_Instrument
View on HN · Topics
> What does action (i.e. not-strongly-worded-letters, i.e. not words) look like? Europe withdraws from the non-proliferation treaty, publicly resolves to building and maintaining a European nuclear deterrent and greenlights members who have been militarily threatened (the Baltics, Poland and Denmark) to start clandestine programmes. The last part doesn't even have to happen. Hell, none of it has to happen. But that would be playing from strength. Unfortunately, Europe is not politically unified enough to do this. (Same for Asia.)
View on HN · Topics
Any sort of pushback at all would be an improvement. Even now, the EU Commission is trying to 'defuse' the Greenland situation by trying to invoke NATO's fifth article, as if that's worth anything without the will of the USA behind it. You know, instead of like actually drawing out plans for a military alliance, economic retribution (remember all those sanctions against Big Tech which fell apart the moment Trump made even the slightest comment against them?) or… just about anything. Laws are worth even less than the paper they're written on, and no amount of naïve idealism (and calling it that is me being generous!) will change that. NATO membership is worthless other than as an aesthetic signifier.
View on HN · Topics
Action probably looks like crash-starting multiple nuclear weapons programs. With or without the help of the british/french. Probably with. I'd imagine programs from: the Nordics and Poland+Baltics. Maybe Germany, probably not.
View on HN · Topics
Sanctions come to my mind.
View on HN · Topics
Almost every country made some repudiation note. But I don't think we'll see anybody doing any actual thing because of that.