Summarizer

Greenland and Canada Threats

Trump administration expansion ambitions, Denmark sovereignty concerns, NATO Article 5 relevance, European nuclear deterrent needs

← Back to There were BGP anomalies during the Venezuela blackout

The threat of U.S. expansionism toward Greenland and Canada has sparked a heated debate over whether diplomatic pushback from Denmark and the UN is a meaningful defense or merely "naive idealism." Critics argue that because NATO’s Article 5 is effectively worthless without American cooperation, European nations may be forced to pursue their own nuclear deterrents to protect their sovereignty against potential "boots on the ground." This cynical outlook suggests that international law is failing to restrain the Trump administration’s ambitions, leaving middle powers with few options beyond radical military escalation or total capitulation.

6 comments tagged with this topic

View on HN · Topics
Look for the same with Greenland or Canada next :/
View on HN · Topics
IMHO the rest of the world isn't asleep. Denmark's prime minister said the same as you, for example. US just got roasted at UN by inter alia, France, with ~20 countries either speaking the same or asking to speak on it. That's just from 30s with front page of nytimes.com.
View on HN · Topics
Given that the nukes topic came up ... Will the US/Trump be so aggressive if Denmark has a few nukes that can hit the US? Or at minimum sink a invading fleet? These actions by Trump are only reinforcing that we will see even more of a push for everybody to get their own nukes, even in Europe. People do not need to yell "bad trump", to have his actions result in decisions being pushed forward like this. Theodore: "speak softly and carry a big stick"... and nuke(s) is a BIG stick.
View on HN · Topics
That just sounds like more 'strongly worded letters' which never go anywhere and they never do anything about. It's over for the EU. They rested on their laurels for too long and cowardice rotted them from the inside. I don't think Denmark will put even a smidge of resistance up. Trump is going to bark some orders, boots are going to hit the ground and it's fait accompli .
View on HN · Topics
Any sort of pushback at all would be an improvement. Even now, the EU Commission is trying to 'defuse' the Greenland situation by trying to invoke NATO's fifth article, as if that's worth anything without the will of the USA behind it. You know, instead of like actually drawing out plans for a military alliance, economic retribution (remember all those sanctions against Big Tech which fell apart the moment Trump made even the slightest comment against them?) or… just about anything. Laws are worth even less than the paper they're written on, and no amount of naïve idealism (and calling it that is me being generous!) will change that. NATO membership is worthless other than as an aesthetic signifier.
View on HN · Topics
Not sure why this got downvoted; we're threatening it again, credibly enough that the Danish PM is telling them to shut up. Yesterday: > Adding to the alarm, Katie Miller, a right-wing podcast host and the wife of Trump adviser Stephen Miller, posted an image of Greenland superimposed with the American flag and the caption "SOON!" https://www.nbcnews.com/world/greenland/trump-venezuela-atta...