Advertising Revenue Sustainability

Debate over whether Meta's record advertising revenue is sustainable given increasing fraud, regulatory scrutiny, lost lawsuits, and declining product quality. Some argue the ad business is self-sustaining regardless of engineering quality, while others predict regulatory consequences.

← Back to Is Meta destroying its engineering organization?

6 comments tagged with this topic

View on HN · Topics
This kind of support should be mandated for any digital utilities company such as Google. The difference between small business success and insolvency was based on the shier luck of being graced with the presence of someone in contact with the priesthood of Google, where no real contact from the plebian citizenry is allowed. Exactly this kind of thing is why the EU feels the need to regulate the shit out of U.S. big tech.
View on HN · Topics
I'd assume it's pruning to make only the best-paying (to Google) restaurants visible.
View on HN · Topics
So you think they weren’t getting paid for this? You think they just freely mention corporate food companies purely for users benefit?
View on HN · Topics
Maps peaked after Google acquired Waze in 2013 and integrated the data. Since then they've added worthless annoying social features and more advertising.
View on HN · Topics
I’ve agreed for a long time… Unfortunately though, Apple Maps just added Ads, so expect them to start having the same issues as Google Maps does (like showing big ads for every location whenever you’re moving around at the map). After Apple Maps being one of my favorite reasons for having an iPhone for the last 7ish years, I’m back to OpenStreetMaps mostly, or still Google to look up business hours. Sad… but having downloaded maps will probably be a good thing long-term
View on HN · Topics
It does less than before and it blocks more things and has more spam. Now you have to pay for map embedding on a website. Let's go back 20 years