Summarizer

Cyber Warfare Capabilities

Discussion of CYBERCOM involvement, power grid attacks, comparison to Stuxnet, and the terrifying implications of state-level cyber attacks

← Back to There were BGP anomalies during the Venezuela blackout

The discussion highlights the chilling evolution of cyber warfare, where disabling a nation's power grid has transitioned from a theoretical horror to a daily reality in modern conflicts. Commenters weigh the strategic impact of operations by entities like CYBERCOM, noting that while nuclear deterrence fails to prevent digital strikes, the ability to sabotage infrastructure through tech dependency offers a potent—and potentially more devastating—alternative to traditional bombing. Amidst debates over the reliability of official leaks and the ethics of "lights out" scenarios, there is a growing consensus that major powers have fully integrated these invisible weapons into their war plans to gain dominance and demoralize adversaries.

18 comments tagged with this topic

View on HN · Topics
If having nuclear weapons did anything at all to prevent cyber attacks, the US would not be getting constantly victimized by cyber attacks.
View on HN · Topics
If you were not already entirely reliant on American tech before, this ought to convince you to put jump in with both feet. What could possibly go wrong?
View on HN · Topics
There is not really any reason to conclude that "american tech" was responsible for this attack. If anything, given all the sanctions Venezuela was under and how friendly they are with china, i would be surprised if they were using american tech in their infrastructure. [Of course i agree with the broader point of dont become dependent on the technology of your geopolitical enemies]
View on HN · Topics
I wonder what kind of capabilities the US army didn't use during this operation.
View on HN · Topics
Cyber-warfare capabilities on this level seem pretty horrific. What if you could simply turn off the power grid of Kyiv or Moscow in anticipation of a strike? That seems extremely disorientating. What if you could simply turn off the power grid indefinitely?
View on HN · Topics
Russia attacks Ukrainian power grid on a weekly basis. Not only with cyber-attacks but with actual bombs. Over Christmas 750k homes in Kyiv were without power or heating. This is not a hypothetical it's daily reality for millions of people in Ukraine.
View on HN · Topics
> What if you could simply turn off the power grid of Kyiv or Moscow in anticipation of a strike? I expect every major world power has a plan to (attempt to) do precisely that to their enemies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphite_bomb > The US Navy used sea-launched Tomahawk missiles with Kit-2 warheads, involving reels of carbon fibers, in Iraq as part of Operation Desert Storm during the Gulf War in 1991, where it disabled about 85% of the electricity supply. The US Air Force used the CBU-94, dropped by F-117 Nighthawks, during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia on 2 May 1999, where it disabled more than 70% national grid electricity supply. I would not, however, take "Trump said something" as indicative of much. "It was dark, the lights of Caracas were largely turned off due to a certain expertise that we have, it was dark, and it was deadly" is both visibly untrue from the video evidence available, and is the precise sort of off-the-cuff low-fact statement he's prone to.
View on HN · Topics
General Caine specifically said they utilized CYBERCOM (which is the US inter-branch hacking command) to pave the way for the special ops helicopters. I personally have no doubt that any (whether or not they all were) lights being out was due to a US hack. Some of the stuff that got blown up may well have been to prevent forensic recover of US tools and techniques.
View on HN · Topics
I have no doubt they used cyberattacks and electronic warfare. Trump just seems the worst person in the world to play a game of telephone with on such a subject. For example: https://www.defensenews.com/air/2025/05/16/pentagon-silent-a... > “The F-35, we’re doing an upgrade, a simple upgrade,” Trump said. “But we’re also doing an F-55, I’m going to call it an F-55. And that’s going to be a substantial upgrade. But it’s going to be also with two engines.” > Frank Kendall, the secretary of the Air Force during former President Joe Biden’s administration, said in an interview with Defense News that it is unclear what Trump was referring to when he discussed an “F-22 Super,” but it may have been a reference to the F-47 sixth-generation fighter jet… Kendall said it is also unclear what Trump was referring to when he discussed the alleged F-55.
View on HN · Topics
Also: “Everything’s computer!”
View on HN · Topics
On the other hand, Trump has a track record of leaking capabilities.
View on HN · Topics
Something like this more or less happened during the initial Israeli strike on Iran ? From what I remember reading, they were able to gain air dominance not because Iranian air-defense was bad, but because it was put almost completely out of service for a brief period of time by people on the ground - be it through sabotage, cyber-warfare, drone attacks from inside, allowing the Israeli jets to annihilate them.
View on HN · Topics
Read about Stuxnet
View on HN · Topics
It's been well known to be a major part of world power war plans for like 20 years now. Yes, it's a terrifying concept.
View on HN · Topics
Russia tried. They haven’t managed to do anything very serious.
View on HN · Topics
I don't think calling shutting down the internet horrific is appropriate at all in the context of bombings.
View on HN · Topics
Ridiculous post. Power outages would kill a lot of people if sustained. A Carrington event would devastate modern society.
View on HN · Topics
We would then hack you.